Talk Back
Post a CommentMost Recent Post
(Feb 21 2008 10:33AM)
Read all comments (7)
HousingZone Most Popular Stories
- AIA 2008 Housing Award Recipients Revealed
- Are real-estate agent incentives really a homebuilder’s best bet?
- How homebuilders can build a green home for less
- 2008 National Sales and Marketing Award Winners
- 2007 Best in American Living Awards
- Total Home Audio for non-Geeks
- Steep Slope Doesn’t Faze Custom Home Builder
- Remodeler Sales Strategies in a Down Market
- Modular and Green
- Wood vs. Engineered Lumber
Green Building Programs More About Bias than Science, Expert Argues
University of Minnesota professors challenges the science behind green building programs
By Susan Bady, Senior Editor, Design
February 1, 2008
Professional Builder
![]() |
| Jim Bowyer believes the lack of life-cycle assessment in many green building programs could defeat the purpose of building green in the first place. |
One of Bowyer's criticisms is that only one of the major programs he's studied, Green Globes, calls for systematic analysis of the environmental impact of materials during their entire life cycles. "I think it's really time for the major programs to move toward adoption of life-cycle assessment/life-cycle inventory, especially when it comes to identifying environmentally preferable construction materials," says Bowyer.
Although adopting LCA won't be easy, without such analysis, seeking to maximize the number of credits could lead to an increase — rather than a decrease — in environmental effects associated with construction.
The U.S. Green Building Council has announced it wants to incorporate LCA throughout its LEED programs, but Bowyer notes, "The USGBC has a history of implementing change at glacial speed." And NAHB isn't faring any better at incorporating LCA into its green building program. "It simply says you can use LCA if you want to, and you get a point for doing it," he says. "But there's no real provision that LCA be used. The way the standard's written, it's kind of unlikely that anybody is even going to do that."
Responding to Bowyer's comments about LEED, Eric Corey Freed, LEED AP and principal of organicArchitect in San Francisco, says, "The good news is that LEED is wonderfully democratic. The bad news is that, like most democracies, it is achingly slow to adopt change."
Freed thinks that as LEED continues to evolve, the standards will become more stringent. But to be successfully incorporated into LEED, an LCA standard would have to be "strong, widely adoptable and easy to understand — not to mention objective, independent and free from possible greenwashing by manufacturers."
He notes that two such LCA standards are becoming available. One is the Smart Consensus Sustainable Product Standard, developed by the Institute for Market Transformation to Sustainability. The other is the Pharos Lens, a "beautifully simple" LCA labeling standard from the Healthy Building Network.
© 2008, Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Talk Back
POST A COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE
- I work on massive scale projects ($......James Deane 02/21/08
- Strong slogan to attract attention ......Richard MacCrea 02/20/08
- I would like the professor to give ......Howard C. Wiig 02/08/08
- The toughest issue regarding "Green......Ricardo Ramos 02/08/08
- I agree with the Professor. There a......Chancey Walker 02/08/08
- It amazes me how some chose to get ......David Murrah 02/07/08
- We need more science and less cheer......Bill Fisher 02/07/08


Digg This
