Talk Back
Post a Comment
|
||||||||||
HousingZone Most Popular Stories
- International Residential Codes Available Online
- Growing your remodeling business in the current economy
- 2008 Remodeler of the Year
- Develop Land Or Buy Lots? Home Builders Face Dilemma
- ProBuilder Product Report: Kitchen Appliances
- What Can You Recycle?
- A smaller home can still be beautiful
- Wood vs. Engineered Lumber
- Myths and Facts About Automatic Fire Sprinklers
- How to Use Percentage-of-Completion Accounting
APA’s Growing Smart: the Good and the Bad
NAHB Opinion
February 1, 2002
Professional Builder
![]() |
| Gary Garczynski |
The application of these planning ideas could profoundly affect home builders and buyers. Some planning options presented in the guidebook could help builders and developers. Conversely, some could be harmful.
Smart growth requires a smart process to implement what a community seeks. When citizens seek to use land in strict conformity to a community’s master plan, they have a right to expect a process that facilitates prompt approval and doesn’t allow individuals who are not directly and adversely affected to stop the process.
A basic philosophical premise of smart growth should be that comprehensive plans are implemented rather than nullified in piecemeal fashion through the development review process. Issues settled during the debate on the comprehensive plan should not be reopened if the plan and the process are to be legitimate.
This important aspect of smart growth is not accorded proper analysis in the guidebook and is another reason to be alert and engaged in this growing issue.
© 2008, Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Digg This
