Talk Back
Post a Comment
|
||||||||||
HousingZone Most Popular Stories
- International Residential Codes Available Online
- Growing your remodeling business in the current economy
- 2008 Remodeler of the Year
- Develop Land Or Buy Lots? Home Builders Face Dilemma
- ProBuilder Product Report: Kitchen Appliances
- What Can You Recycle?
- A smaller home can still be beautiful
- Wood vs. Engineered Lumber
- Myths and Facts About Automatic Fire Sprinklers
- How to Use Percentage-of-Completion Accounting
Water Softener
NAHB Public Affairs
May 1, 2002
Professional Builder
![]() |
| NAHB President Gary Garczynski |
In a recent proposed settlement of litigation that the NAHB filed two years ago, the National Marine Fisheries Service agreed to rescind its critical-habitat designation for 19 West Coast sal-mon and steelhead populations and to craft a new designation based on sound science and an analysis of the economic im-pacts of designating land as critical habitat. As part of the settlement, the NAHB agreed to dismiss its Endangered Species Act suit against the federal agency.
The designation the NAHB challenged encompasses a region spanning 150 watersheds, river segments, bays and estuaries in Washington, Oregon, California and Idaho. In the lawsuit, the NAHB and 16 other groups as-serted that the areas designated as critical habitat by the NMFS are “excessive, unduly vague, not justified as essential to conserve the listed species and not based upon a required analysis of economic impacts.”
The proposed settlement is a step in the right direction, and we applaud the government. The NAHB believes that environmental protection of any species should be based on law, sound science and economic impact. This settlement brings that ideal closer to reality.
© 2008, Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Digg This
