Wood vs. Engineered Lumber

For years, builders have used traditional lumber to build homes; however, ever since engineered lumber came into the picture, builders have been left wondering — which one do I use for my projects?

With current industry production of more than a billion lineal feet a year (2003 production) and a rate of increase of over 20 percent per year, engineered lumber is gaining popularity among builders.

Traditional solid sawn lumber is still a very popular choice for builders primarily due to familiarization with the product. The costs for solid sawn lumber are initially lower, but product quality issues can become costly for builders to correct after installation. Dimensional lumber is also limited to smaller depths and lengths since their size is dependent on the size of the timber cut to make them.

According to the APA — The Engineered Wood Association, North American production of most engineered wood products is forecast to rise significantly over the next five years. The growth of engineered wood products is testimony to the technological adaptability of the wood products industry in the face of a changing wood fiber resource base.

"With less traditional and public forest timber available for wood product manufacturing, producers have had to improve existing methods and invent new ways to make more with less, and with alternative wood fiber resources," Jack Merry, communications director at the APA — The Engineered Wood Association. "The industry is responding with marked success to that challenge."

Although the term engineered lumber is used to describe a variety of materials, most are defined as structural components that have been fabricated. Engineered wood is manufactured by bonding together wood strands, veneers, lumber or other forms of wood fiber to produce a larger and integral composite unit that is stronger and stiffer than the sum of its parts.

Probably the most significant contributor to the increased use of engineered lumber is the total installed costs are less than that of dimensional lumber. Additional benefits are related to ease of installation, dimensional stability, and structural integrity of engineered products. "Engineered wood products actually improve upon many of the inherent structural advantages of wood," adds Merry. "Cross-laminated plywood and oriented strand board, for example, distribute loads along-the-grain strength of wood in both panel axes. Glulam beams and wood I-joists can carry greater loads over longer spans than is possible with solid sawn wood of the same size," adds Merry.

Consistency of the material quality is the key advantage of engineered wood. Fabricated from dry materials to very tight manufacturing standards, wood I-joists generally do not shrink, warp, cup, crown, or twist. Quality assurance programs are required during manufacturing to ensure final products of uniform strength and stiffness. These factors all contribute the product's dimensional stability.

The manufacturing processes required for wood products add costs, making engineered wood more expensive per lineal foot than traditional sawn lumber. "The benefit is realized in total installed cost of the product," according to Mike O'Day, manager of engineered lumber for Georgia Pacific. "The installed costs consist of material usage, and labor requirements for installation. Engineered lumber can speed installation time and reduce labor since they are lighter and can be spaced further apart than dimensional lumber. The result is typically a lower total installed cost per square foot with engineered lumber," adds O'Day. Engineered lumber also reduces the number of call backs for builders. Squeaky, or bouncy floors are usually expensive to correct. Installations using engineered I-beams can significantly reduce callbacks related to this problem.

Manufactured wood products are also environmentally friendly. "With the advent of forest farming as a primary source of wood fiber in the U.S., it is getting exceedingly difficult to find a resource that will permit the milling of larger pieces of framing lumber. Wood I-joists can be manufactured in depths exceeding 48 inches and lengths over 40 feet and use up to 60 percent less wood fiber than solid-sawn joists. On the job site there is little or no waste," adds Edward L. Keith, P.E., senior engineer for the APA — The Engineered Wood Association.

In addition to the common nominal 10 and 12 inch depths, engineered I-joists are made in depths beyond that of traditional framing lumber. Depths up to 48 inches and lengths limited only by ground transportation and handling are available to builders. An advantage over lumber is that a deeper I-joist member is only incrementally more expensive than a shallower member because it is made deeper by adding more web material. Ordering I-joists that are cut to the exact length required means 100 percent utilization in the field, resulting in little or no waste on the jobsite.

Because of their "I" cross sectional shape, they weigh up to 60 percent less than lumber joists making them easier to handle. The flange permits a firm, comfortable, secure grip even when the joist is wet or covered with wood dust. A single worker can easily handle a joist up to 25-40 feet in length.

Like traditional lumber, engineered lumber does have its limitations. The key to understanding acceptable applications is in education of the materials. Currently, most engineered wood products are limited to interior use.

Resistance to specifying engineered lumber generally comes from subcontractors that are not familiar with the product. Subs need to be careful when installing plumbing and electricity that must be routed through engineered lumber. Careful consideration needs to be taken where and how it is cut. "Holes less than 1.5 inches diameter are generally okay as long as they're not on, or into the flange. Drilling through the web material is normally an acceptable practice," says, O'Day.

Damage to wood I-joists within a structural system is normally associated with notching of the flanges or misapplication of the manufacturer's web hole information. Designing a repair for a damaged I-joist can be very difficult and requires an understanding of I-joists, adhesives and fasteners that may not be familiar to many designers. Fortunately, most manufacturers are more than willing to provide fixes for most applications. There are a number of products currently working through the code acceptance system that can be used in the field to restore the joist to its full capacity without having to have the solution engineered.

Installations using engineered lumber have increased over the last 10 years due to education of the materials and their advantages. Ten years ago, fewer than 30 percent of the floors used engineered lumber and in 2004 almost 50 percent of new homes have I-joists installed.