GIANTS
![]() Riverside-San Bernardino, home of the Inland Empire, is facing a harsh reality of market conditions. |
With home prices more than doubling from 2001 to 2006, housing costs reached an all-time high one year ago, when purchasing a median-price detached home would have eaten up 69 percent of the median income (assuming an 80 percent LTV fixed-rate mortgage and the 20 percent down payment amortized over 7 years).
At 64 percent of income today, housing costs in Riverside—San Bernardino make it the most expensive (in relation to income) place to live in the country that does not abut the Pacific or Atlantic oceans or San Francisco Bay.
OversupplyWhat is most significant about the Inland Empire's non-coastal location is that it is not supply-constrained. Places like San Francisco, New York and Miami are very expensive places to live partially because there is so little housing built each year. This is not the case in Riverside-San Bernardino, where more than 51,000 building permits were issued in both 2004 and 2005.
Although permits have slowed, the number of new-home communities continues to grow. The 640-plus actively selling new home communities in the region today represent a 55 percent increase from just three years ago and a 10 percent increase from just one year ago. With such a large amount of new-home supply for sale at once, competition is fierce. To add insult to injury, there are more than 60,000 resale homes for sale, which is a 13-month supply.
Mortgage ExposureThe Inland Empire will probably be the hardest-hit market by the blowup in the mortgage industry for several reasons:
Job growth in the region remains solid and is likely to remain strong for years to come, yet the preponderance of new jobs are low-paying jobs, particularly in warehousing and distribution. Of the nearly 45,000 payroll jobs created over the last year, only 23 percent fit into categories that we consider to be high-paying.
This market won't stabilize until housing costs return to normal levels of income and the supply of both resale listings and actively-selling new home communities falls by more than 50 percent. Some extraordinary event will be needed for this stabilization to occur before 2011.
| EMPLOYMENT | AFFORDABILITY | PERMITS | ||||||||||
| Short-Term Outlook/Grade | 1-Year Payroll Employment Growth | 1-Year Growth Rate | Unemployment Rate | Median Resale Home Price | Resale Housing Costs as % of Income* | Housing Cycle Barometer** | 12-Month Single-Family Permits | 1-Year Single-Family Growth | 12-Month Total Permits | Total Permits as % of Peak Permits*** | ||
| 1 | Houston | 76,500 | 3.1% | 4.4% | $159,500 | 28% | 5.5 | 49,142 | -11% | 68,321 | 91% | |
| 2 | Atlanta | 41,600 | 1.7% | 4.5% | $173,478 | 25% | 4.5 | 42,634 | -31% | 57,315 | 76% | |
| 3 | Phoenix | 61,600 | 3.3% | 3.0% | $262,500 | 41% | 6.8 | 33,965 | -35% | 42,386 | 61% | |
| 4 | Riverside-SB | 44,900 | 3.5% | 5.6% | $382,500 | 64% | 9.1 | 22,582 | -48% | 25,882 | 45% | |
| 5 | Dallas | 61,400 | 3.0% | 4.4% | $172,400 | 29% | 5.3 | 22,271 | -31% | 31,000 | 42% | |
| 6 | Charlotte | 22,600 | 2.8% | 5.1% | $184,500 | 30% | 5.1 | 18,554 | -11% | 24,206 | 96% | |
| 7 | Chicago | 35,400 | 0.9% | 5.6% | $255,000 | 40% | 6.1 | 17,477 | -39% | 33,982 | 73% | |
| 8 | Orlando | 22,900 | 2.1% | 3.6% | $250,000 | 42% | 7.3 | 16,793 | -38% | 24,801 | 69% | |
| 9 | Las Vegas | 19,000 | 2.1% | 4.7% | $302,500 | 50% | 7.3 | 15,828 | -47% | 21,490 | 50% | |
| 10 | Austin | 29,000 | 4.0% | 3.8% | $190,900 | 34% | 5.5 | 14,577 | -24% | 20,862 | 77% | |
| 11 | Washington D.C. | 39,000 | 1.6% | 3.3% | $431,734 | 52% | 9.5 | 13,916 | -28% | 19,267 | 51% | |
| 12 | Nashville | 9,900 | 1.3% | 3.7% | $164,900 | 29% | 5.6 | 12,895 | -10% | 14,603 | 80% | |
| 13 | Raleigh-Cary | 11,400 | 2.3% | 4.0% | $205,000 | 31% | 5.2 | 12,796 | -12% | 15,778 | 89% | |
| 14 | Fort Worth | 22,400 | 2.7% | 4.4% | $117,300 | 21% | 5.2 | 12,041 | -35% | 16,768 | 44% | |
| 15 | San Antonio | 17,200 | 2.1% | 4.4% | $156,900 | 32% | 5.5 | 11,394 | -26% | 15,933 | 69% | |
| 16 | Tampa | 11,200 | 0.9% | 3.9% | $195,000 | 36% | 6.4 | 10,784 | -58% | 15,174 | 40% | |
| 17 | Seattle | 40,200 | 2.8% | 4.1% | $435,000 | 62% | 10.0 | 10,264 | -15% | 20,446 | 74% | |
| 18 | Denver | 16,700 | 1.4% | 3.9% | $258,000 | 41% | 6.6 | 9,899 | -42% | 15,728 | 55% | |
| 19 | Minneapolis | 26,900 | 1.5% | 4.4% | $239,000 | 34% | 5.7 | 9,522 | -39% | 12,755 | 45% | |
| 20 | Portland | 14,400 | 1.4% | 4.8% | $288,500 | 48% | 9.9 | 9,125 | -27% | 13,959 | 71% | |
| Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics; Census Bureau through the month ending June 2007; John Burns Real Estate Consulting. Data on all markets available at www.realestateconsulting.com *Proprietary affordability scale with 0 meaning most affordable time since 1983, 5 meaning median affordability, and 10 meaning least affordable time. **Annual Mortgage Costs +1/7th of the downpayment divided by income. *** Peak activity since 1985. |
||||||||||||
| Acknowledgements | ||
| Chris Porter contributed to this article as well. John Burns helps many of the largest companies in the industry with strategy and monitoring market conditions. He can be reached at jburns@realestateconsulting.com. | ||
© 2009, Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.