84% of Markets Are Overpriced
Of the 100 largest metropolitan areas (based on annual permit activity):
- Only 13 markets are below their historical median affordability level, 3 are exactly at their median and 84 are above the median.
- The four markets that have remained very inexpensive are Cincinnati, Indianapolis, Cleveland and Pittsburgh.
- Nine markets have even worse affordability levels than when mortgage rates were 18%+ in the early 1980s: New York, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles, Seattle, Portland (Oregon), Baltimore, Edison (New Jersey), Nassau (New York) and Naples.
Our methodology compares current affordability in each market to historic affordability in the market to determine whether housing is more or less expensive in the market than in price downturns. From the map below, it is evident that the overpriced markets are those along the coasts, while the inland markets tend to be less overpriced. Supply constraints make the coastal markets susceptible to price bubbles, while plentiful supply makes the inland markets susceptible to oversupply bubbles.
![]() |
About the Barometer
The Housing Cycle Barometer™ calculates the ratio between home prices and income levels, and the ratio between mortgage payments and income levels. Then, we analyze 25 years of history in each metropolitan area, and compare the current ratios to the median ratios in each area. The down payment and mortgage payments are appropriately weighted based on total expenditures over the life of a typical home purchase. This methodology accurately determines which markets are overpriced and underpriced, even in an environment with historically low mortgage rates.
The Barometer ranges from 0 to 10, and is generally categorized as follows:
- Potential Housing Bubble: 7.5 to 10.0
- Overpriced in Comparison to History: 5.0 to 7.5
- No Housing Bubble: 0.0 to 5.0
A Barometer reading above 5.0 does not mean that the housing market will deteriorate this year. While the Barometer is very meaningful from a macro standpoint, it does not consider neighborhood market conditions, nor does it consider the ability of certain real estate executives to execute their business plans in tough market conditions.
|
HOUSING CYCLE BAROMETER™ | |||||||||||
|
This is the most current available data for all variables and markets. | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Down Payment / Income Information |
Mortgage Payment / Income Information |
||||||
|
|
|
|
Housing Cycle Barometer |
Current Price |
Current Income |
Current Down Pmt |
Current D Pmt /Inc |
|
Current Ann Mtg Pmt |
Current Mtg Pmt/Inc |
Housing Cost /Inc Ratio |
|
1 |
Atlanta, GA |
5.6 |
$173,200 |
$53,735 |
$34,640 |
64% |
|
$10,751 |
20% |
29% | |
|
2 |
Houston, TX |
5.5 |
$155,400 |
$51,826 |
$31,080 |
60% |
|
$9,646 |
19% |
27% | |
|
3 |
Phoenix, AZ |
6.9 |
$268,000 |
$56,879 |
$53,600 |
94% |
|
$16,636 |
29% |
43% | |
|
4 |
Riverside-San Bernardino, CA |
9.9 |
$390,000 |
$50,653 |
$78,000 |
154% |
|
$24,209 |
48% |
70% | |
|
5 |
Chicago, IL |
7.5 |
$258,000 |
$52,950 |
$51,600 |
97% |
|
$16,015 |
30% |
44% | |
|
6 |
Las Vegas, NV |
7.6 |
$310,000 |
$54,399 |
$62,000 |
114% |
|
$19,243 |
35% |
52% | |
|
7 |
Dallas, TX |
5.2 |
$165,800 |
$55,218 |
$33,160 |
60% |
|
$10,292 |
19% |
27% | |
|
8 |
New York, NY-NJ |
10.0 |
$559,992 |
$53,383 |
$111,998 |
210% |
|
$34,761 |
65% |
95% | |
|
9 |
Orlando, FL |
7.7 |
$250,000 |
$50,217 |
$50,000 |
100% |
|
$15,519 |
31% |
45% | |
|
10 |
Tampa, FL |
7.4 |
$203,000 |
$44,455 |
$40,600 |
91% |
|
$12,601 |
28% |
41% | |
|
11 |
Washington D.C., DC-VA-MD-WV |
10.0 |
$439,633 |
$72,041 |
$87,927 |
122% |
|
$27,290 |
38% |
55% | |
|
12 |
Fort Myers, FL |
7.3 |
$264,500 |
$49,582 |
$52,900 |
107% |
|
$16,419 |
33% |
48% | |
|
13 |
Austin, TX |
5.3 |
$177,000 |
$50,847 |
$35,400 |
70% |
|
$10,987 |
22% |
32% | |
|
14 |
Miami, FL |
8.8 |
$339,000 |
$44,874 |
$67,800 |
151% |
|
$21,043 |
47% |
68% | |
|
15 |
Los Angeles, CA |
10.0 |
$549,000 |
$49,867 |
$109,800 |
220% |
|
$34,079 |
68% |
100% | |
|
16 |
Charlotte, NC-SC |
5.2 |
$176,000 |
$53,549 |
$35,200 |
66% |
|
$10,925 |
20% |
30% | |
|
17 |
Jacksonville, FL |
6.6 |
$193,000 |
$51,526 |
$38,600 |
75% |
|
$11,980 |
23% |
34% | |
|
18 |
San Antonio, TX |
5.4 |
$146,800 |
$44,780 |
$29,360 |
66% |
|
$9,112 |
20% |
30% | |
|
19 |
Fort Worth, TX |
5.4 |
$120,300 |
$51,124 |
$24,060 |
47% |
|
$7,468 |
15% |
21% | |
|
20 |
Denver, CO |
6.1 |
$246,000 |
$57,564 |
$49,200 |
85% |
|
$15,270 |
27% |
39% | |
|
21 |
Seattle, WA |
10.0 |
$390,000 |
$53,023 |
$78,000 |
147% |
|
$24,209 |
46% |
67% | |
|
22 |
Minneapolis, MN-WI |
6.3 |
$246,500 |
$67,080 |
$49,300 |
73% |
|
$15,301 |
23% |
33% | |
|
23 |
Portland, OR-WA |
10.0 |
$277,000 |
$49,099 |
$55,400 |
113% |
|
$17,195 |
35% |
51% | |
|
24 |
Raleigh-Cary, NC |
5.1 |
$190,000 |
$56,872 |
$38,000 |
67% |
|
$11,794 |
21% |
30% | |
|
25 |
Sacramento, CA |
9.4 |
$395,000 |
$53,869 |
$79,000 |
147% |
|
$24,519 |
46% |
66% | |
|
26 |
Nashville, TN |
5.8 |
$161,300 |
$48,770 |
$32,260 |
66% |
|
$10,013 |
21% |
30% | |
|
27 |
Indianapolis, IN |
1.6 |
$121,615 |
$50,977 |
$24,323 |
48% |
|
$7,549 |
15% |
22% | |
|
28 |
Kansas City, MO-KS |
5.4 |
$155,913 |
$48,822 |
$31,183 |
64% |
|
$9,678 |
20% |
29% | |
|
29 |
Lakeland, FL |
6.6 |
$173,000 |
$41,934 |
$34,600 |
83% |
|
$10,739 |
26% |
37% | |
|
30 |
St. Louis, MO-IL |
6.9 |
$172,500 |
$46,099 |
$34,500 |
75% |
|
$10,708 |
23% |
34% | |
|
31 |
Myrtle Beach, SC |
6.4 |
$198,567 |
$39,001 |
$39,713 |
102% |
|
$12,326 |
32% |
46% | |
|
32 |
Sarasota, FL |
9.3 |
$270,000 |
$49,066 |
$54,000 |
110% |
|
$16,760 |
34% |
50% | |
|
33 |
Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN |
1.2 |
$135,000 |
$50,693 |
$27,000 |
53% |
|
$8,380 |
17% |
24% | |
|
34 |
Philadelphia, PA |
7.5 |
$230,820 |
$59,395 |
$46,164 |
78% |
|
$14,328 |
24% |
35% | |
|
35 |
Memphis, TN-MS-AR |
4.2 |
$143,495 |
$44,169 |
$28,699 |
65% |
|
$8,907 |
20% |
29% | |
|
36 |
Oakland, CA |
9.4 |
$630,000 |
$68,659 |
$126,000 |
184% |
|
$39,107 |
57% |
83% | |
|
37 |
Boise City, ID |
5.3 |
$176,076 |
$53,430 |
$35,215 |
66% |
|
$10,930 |
20% |
30% | |
|
38 |
San Diego, CA |
9.1 |
$565,000 |
$59,321 |
$113,000 |
190% |
|
$35,072 |
59% |
86% | |
|
39 |
Tucson, AZ |
6.5 |
$229,995 |
$46,821 |
$45,999 |
98% |
|
$14,277 |
30% |
45% | |
|
40 |
Charleston, SC |
5.6 |
$207,000 |
$46,522 |
$41,400 |
89% |
|
$12,849 |
28% |
40% | |
|
41 |
Columbus, OH |
5.0 |
$147,000 |
$50,737 |
$29,400 |
58% |
|
$9,125 |
18% |
26% | |
|
42 |
Virginia Beach, VA-NC |
8.1 |
$236,004 |
$50,277 |
$47,201 |
94% |
|
$14,650 |
29% |
43% | |
|
43 |
Baltimore, MD |
10.0 |
$305,863 |
$60,598 |
$61,173 |
101% |
|
$18,986 |
31% |
46% | |
|
44 |
West Palm Beach, FL |
7.9 |
$325,000 |
$51,228 |
$65,000 |
127% |
|
$20,174 |
39% |
58% | |
|
45 |
Port St. Lucie, FL |
9.5 |
$235,000 |
$44,015 |
$47,000 |
107% |
|
$14,587 |
33% |
48% | |
|
46 |
Richmond, VA |
6.7 |
$227,000 |
$51,569 |
$45,400 |
88% |
|
$14,091 |
27% |
40% | |
|
47 |
Warren, MI |
6.6 |
$196,365 |
$51,109 |
$39,273 |
77% |
|
$12,189 |
24% |
35% | |
|
48 |
Edison, NJ |
10.0 |
$399,658 |
$68,030 |
$79,932 |
117% |
|
$24,808 |
36% |
53% | |
|
49 |
Salt Lake City, UT |
5.0 |
$210,000 |
$59,388 |
$42,000 |
71% |
|
$13,036 |
22% |
32% | |
|
50 |
Bakersfield, CA |
9.0 |
$265,000 |
$42,492 |
$53,000 |
125% |
|
$16,450 |
39% |
57% | |
|
51 |
Oklahoma City, OK |
5.0 |
$123,509 |
$49,771 |
$24,702 |
50% |
|
$7,667 |
15% |
22% | |
|
52 |
McAllen, TX |
3.5 |
$107,000 |
$30,731 |
$21,400 |
70% |
|
$6,642 |
22% |
32% | |
|
53 |
Wilmington, NC |
6.6 |
$217,300 |
$45,162 |
$43,460 |
96% |
|
$13,489 |
30% |
44% | |
|
54 |
Melbourne, FL |
7.0 |
$209,950 |
$50,674 |
$41,990 |
83% |
|
$13,032 |
26% |
38% | |
|
55 |
Ocala, FL |
7.8 |
$157,000 |
$36,700 |
$31,400 |
86% |
|
$9,746 |
27% |
39% | |
|
56 |
Newark-Union, NJ-PA |
8.6 |
$434,819 |
$67,715 |
$86,964 |
128% |
|
$26,991 |
40% |
58% | |
|
57 |
Birmingham, AL |
5.7 |
$169,536 |
$40,635 |
$33,907 |
83% |
|
$10,524 |
26% |
38% | |
|
58 |
Fayetteville, AR-MO |
4.9 |
$135,325 |
$45,280 |
$27,065 |
60% |
|
$8,400 |
19% |
27% | |
|
59 |
Orange County, CA |
9.5 |
$700,000 |
$70,812 |
$140,000 |
198% |
|
$43,452 |
61% |
90% | |
|
60 |
Columbia, SC |
5.1 |
$123,950 |
$45,544 |
$24,790 |
54% |
|
$7,694 |
17% |
25% | |
|
61 |
Fort Lauderdale, FL |
8.5 |
$330,000 |
$50,486 |
$66,000 |
131% |
|
$20,484 |
41% |
59% | |
|
62 |
Albuquerque, NM |
5.1 |
$185,000 |
$50,033 |
$37,000 |
74% |
|
$11,484 |
23% |
34% | |
|
63 |
Fresno, CA |
8.2 |
$285,000 |
$43,647 |
$57,000 |
131% |
|
$17,691 |
41% |
59% | |
|
64 |
Tacoma, WA |
8.8 |
$267,500 |
$51,355 |
$53,500 |
104% |
|
$16,605 |
32% |
47% | |
|
65 |
Boston, MA |
9.5 |
$416,744 |
$67,713 |
$83,349 |
123% |
|
$25,869 |
38% |
56% | |
|
66 |
Nassau, NY |
10.0 |
$488,157 |
$81,208 |
$97,631 |
120% |
|
$30,302 |
37% |
54% | |
|
67 |
Baton Rouge, LA |
5.5 |
$160,909 |
$44,387 |
$32,182 |
73% |
|
$9,988 |
23% |
33% | |
|
68 |
Greensboro, NC |
4.2 |
$149,918 |
$45,318 |
$29,984 |
66% |
|
$9,306 |
21% |
30% | |
|
69 |
Knoxville, TN |
5.5 |
$148,740 |
$40,305 |
$29,748 |
74% |
|
$9,233 |
23% |
33% | |
|
70 |
Colorado Springs, CO |
6.2 |
$206,000 |
$51,759 |
$41,200 |
80% |
|
$12,787 |
25% |
36% | |
|
71 |
Naples, FL |
10.0 |
$471,000 |
$54,373 |
$94,200 |
173% |
|
$29,237 |
54% |
79% | |
|
72 |
Des Moines, IA |
5.4 |
$145,599 |
$50,147 |
$29,120 |
58% |
|
$9,038 |
18% |
26% | |
|
73 |
Cambridge, MA |
7.1 |
$444,022 |
$76,912 |
$88,804 |
115% |
|
$27,563 |
36% |
52% | |
|
74 |
Provo-Orem, UT |
4.0 |
$181,710 |
$53,241 |
$36,342 |
68% |
|
$11,279 |
21% |
31% | |
|
75 |
Tulsa, OK |
4.3 |
$131,694 |
$48,905 |
$26,339 |
54% |
|
$8,175 |
17% |
24% | |
|
76 |
Daytona Beach, FL |
6.5 |
$189,200 |
$43,139 |
$37,840 |
88% |
|
$11,744 |
27% |
40% | |
|
77 |
Cleveland, OH |
1.6 |
$131,264 |
$47,444 |
$26,253 |
55% |
|
$8,148 |
17% |
25% | |
|
78 |
Reno, NV |
7.8 |
$340,000 |
$55,829 |
$68,000 |
122% |
|
$21,105 |
38% |
55% | |
|
79 |
Omaha, NE-IA |
5.5 |
$144,561 |
$50,009 |
$28,912 |
58% |
|
$8,973 |
18% |
26% | |
|
80 |
Pittsburgh, PA |
2.0 |
$116,510 |
$46,048 |
$23,302 |
51% |
|
$7,232 |
16% |
23% | |
|
81 |
Louisville, KY-IN |
5.5 |
$135,630 |
$44,764 |
$27,126 |
61% |
|
$8,419 |
19% |
27% | |
|
82 |
Little Rock, AR |
4.8 |
$130,104 |
$48,589 |
$26,021 |
54% |
|
$8,076 |
17% |
24% | |
|
83 |
San Francisco, CA |
9.4 |
$850,000 |
$72,255 |
$170,000 |
235% |
|
$52,763 |
73% |
107% | |
|
84 |
San Jose, CA |
9.4 |
$760,000 |
$82,030 |
$152,000 |
185% |
|
$47,176 |
58% |
84% | |
|
85 |
Greenville, SC |
6.0 |
$139,250 |
$41,731 |
$27,850 |
67% |
|
$8,644 |
21% |
30% | |
|
86 |
Punta Gorda, FL |
8.3 |
$190,000 |
$40,126 |
$38,000 |
95% |
|
$11,794 |
29% |
43% | |
|
87 |
El Paso, TX |
5.3 |
$129,900 |
$38,889 |
$25,980 |
67% |
|
$8,064 |
21% |
30% | |
|
88 |
Ogden-Clearfield, UT |
4.2 |
$162,274 |
$55,941 |
$32,455 |
58% |
|
$10,073 |
18% |
26% | |
|
89 |
Hilton Head-Beaufort, SC |
6.8 |
$279,500 |
$49,105 |
$55,900 |
114% |
|
$17,350 |
35% |
52% | |
|
90 |
Milwaukee, WI |
8.4 |
$223,160 |
$47,508 |
$44,632 |
94% |
|
$13,852 |
29% |
43% | |
|
91 |
Durham, NC |
5.1 |
$170,097 |
$49,645 |
$34,019 |
69% |
|
$10,559 |
21% |
31% | |
|
92 |
Madison, WI |
7.1 |
$224,683 |
$51,531 |
$44,937 |
87% |
|
$13,947 |
27% |
40% | |
|
93 |
Killeen, TX |
3.9 |
$110,660 |
$44,313 |
$22,132 |
50% |
|
$6,869 |
16% |
23% | |
|
94 |
Allentown, PA-NJ |
9.6 |
$252,218 |
$52,887 |
$50,444 |
95% |
|
$15,656 |
30% |
43% | |
|
95 |
Stockton, CA |
8.6 |
$415,000 |
$45,767 |
$83,000 |
181% |
|
$25,761 |
56% |
82% | |
|
96 |
Springfield, MO |
5.4 |
$131,073 |
$35,286 |
$26,215 |
74% |
|
$8,136 |
23% |
34% | |
|
97 |
Providence, RI-MA |
8.7 |
$298,929 |
$52,876 |
$59,786 |
113% |
|
$18,556 |
35% |
51% | |
|
98 |
Tallahassee, FL |
5.5 |
$184,623 |
$43,574 |
$36,925 |
85% |
|
$11,460 |
26% |
38% | |
|
99 |
Lake-Kenosha, IL-WI |
7.4 |
$282,139 |
$62,190 |
$56,428 |
91% |
|
$17,514 |
28% |
41% | |
|
100 |
Lexington, KY |
5.4 |
$149,165 |
$41,540 |
$29,833 |
72% |
|
$9,259 |
22% |
33% | |
John Burns publishes three free Building Market Intelligence e-mails each month: U.S., Local and Strategic. He helps real estate executives develop and execute strategic plans, conduct market research and maximize profitability. His website is www.realestateconsulting.com.
Comments on: "84% of Markets Are Overpriced"
Reference Library
The iPad changed mobile computing forever, but is it the best tool for field and office...
In honor of Professional Builder's 75th anniversary, we profile pioneering figures, breakthrough...
Generating new-home sales revenue and reducing unnecessary costs are not all that complicated —...
To answer the demand for universal design, manufacturers continue to develop products for the...
Professional Builder’s House Review design team presents five plans that trim the fat and focus...
Buying concrete turnkey can add a level of confusion about what is being purchased and for how...





















